Leader
The Pressure to Apply
Back in the day, a researcher would submit an application
to the Academy of Finland or another funding body
when he or she had had an unusually good idea. If the idea
was good in reality, the chances of getting funding were
reasonable.
Now researchers "have to apply" and university management
needs to encourage everyone to apply. The percentages of funding
granted have gone down to below 10. Even good applications do not
go through and those who give out funding are in a difficult spot.
Why has a bearable situation become nearly unbearable?
For many researchers, competitive funding is their only hope of
continuing their profession in an ever impoverishing funding situation.
For universities, it is an important additional resource, and overhead
shares are used to fund facilities and administration. Universities
also get a bonus for competitive funding through the funding model.
Politicians and public servants have favoured competition at the
expense of "basic funding" - it is viewed as a guarantee of quality, but
also as a strategic instrument of control.
In Finland, direct public research funding constitutes only 44 percent
of public research funding, while the rest of it is competitive. In Denmark,
Switzerland and the Netherlands, who succeed better than us
in science rankings, the basic funding shares as calculated in the same
way are 57, 68 and 78 percent (Olli Poropudas, Helsingin Sanomat August
2, 2015).
Why is this? It seems that basic funding is sometimes regarded as a block grant or as "basic income", which does not develop
operations or encourage towards quality. This is
an erroneous view.
Basic funding is mainly compensation for calculable
units of performance, like degrees and research
publications. Universities agree on these with the
state government in performance agreement negotiations.
The state gets what it asks for, and this is why
the directive authority of the state as a basic funder
is at least as strong as it is when the state is a competitive
funder. Even basic funding incorporates the
requirement to succeed in competitions for research
funding and publication.
Instead of "basic funding", it would be better to
speak about "performance agreement funding", or
just "agreement funding".
The current pain of futile and frustrating work and
the need for "dismantling norms" hints at the idea
that the funding system as a whole wastes resources.
Agreement funding should mainly be targeted at
the basic tasks of the university. Nevertheless, it gets
used for other purposes. More and more working time
is being used for securing funding from other state
funding sections instead of research, teaching or influencing.
There are few "ordinary" lecturers or professors in
Finnish universities, and a lot of project people. Even
combining units does not add to the total number of
academic posts, at the time of cuts probably the other
way around.
Despite the difficulty of applying, researcherteachers
probably do not want that research funders
would have even less funds to distribute. But most of
all they want opportunities for working, even to have
some kind of a career.
Rationalizing administration could help focus on
central tasks, but the possibilities are limited, if the
funding model itself feeds the funding roulette - and
inevitably increases research administration.
Fragmented funding breaks up work and the
combination of scarcity and multiple incentives causes
application hysteria and disappointment. For
example "ordinary" lecturers and professors should
be guaranteed the basic preconditions for research or
developing teaching without the need to constantly
apply for funding for it.
Would there also be reason to change the funding
model at least in such a way that domestic competitive
funding would be a sufficient reward in itself,
and the pressure to apply would not be increased with
the additional levers of the funding model? Being successful
with applications or quality publications are,
in any case, already considered to be merits.
Petri Koikkalainen
Chair, The Finnish Union of
University Researchers and
Teachers
- Painetussa lehdessä sivu 36
|